gs4
150 Words10 Marks
Q.“Refugees should not be turned back to the country where they would face persecution or human right violation.” Examine the statement with reference to ethical dimension being violated by the nation claiming to be democratic with open society.
UPSC Mains 2021•International Relations
Model Answer
View this Question In PYQ RealmSyllabus Point
- Ethical Issues in International Relations and Funding
Approach
- Introduction (Definition) (30-40 words)
- Introduce the state of refugees with stats and reports like by UNHCR.
- Body (Explanation) (80-90 words)
- Discuss Ethical Dimensions concerned in turning back refugees
- Discuss the Reasons why open and democratic nations turn back refugees
- Conclusion (20 words)
- Emphasise on the fact that while economic and security concerns are valid, turning away persecuted individuals contradicts the core principles of human rights, justice, and global solidarity. A balanced policy approach is needed to integrate refugees while safeguarding national interests.
Introduction
According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), a refugee is an individual forced to flee their home country due to fear of persecution, conflict, or systemic violence. UNHCR reports indicated that by the end of 2021, global refugee figures had reached approximately 26.4 million.
graph TD subgraph EP["Ethical Principles"] MO["Moral obligations"] HP["Humanitarianism principle"] NRP["Non-refoulement principle"] end subgraph NC["National Concerns"] PC["Political concerns"] EC["Economic concerns"] SC["Security concerns"] LC["Legal concerns"] end EP --- Scale((("Balancing Scale"))) --- NC
Body Analysis
Ethical Dimensions concerned in turning back refugees:
- Violation of Non-Refoulement: Turning back refugees directly violates the core international ethical and legal principle of non-refoulement, which strictly prohibits returning individuals to territories where their lives or freedoms are threatened.
- Undermining Democratic Values: When liberal democracies deny asylum seekers, they compromise the foundational values of liberty and human rights they claim to champion, contributing to global humanitarian crises.
- Breach of Humanitarianism: Humanitarianism dictates a moral obligation to alleviate human suffering. Prioritizing narrow national self-interest over the survival of vulnerable populations represents a failure of this ethical duty.
- Severe Human Consequences: Forcing refugees back often leaves them stranded in highly dangerous, life-threatening conditions or in transit zones devoid of basic human rights and legal protections.
- Failure of Global Moral Obligation: Democratic nations, as prominent members of the international community, have a collective moral duty to support global human rights. Turning away refugees represents a failure to uphold this global responsibility.
graph TD R["Refugees"] R --> Allow R --> Cant["Can't Allow"] subgraph Allow["Allow"] H["Humanitarian"] C["Compassion"] L["Liberalism"] Co["Cosmopolitanism"] end subgraph Cant["Can't Allow"] Re["Realism"] Cf["Conflicts"] DS["Domestic Strain"] end
Reasons why open and democratic nations turn back refugees:
- Security concerns: Nations often perceive large refugee inflows as potential security risks, fearing infiltration by hostile elements. For example, the US historically suspended certain refugee programs citing national security interests.
- Economic concerns: Host nations worry about the economic strain on public services, welfare systems, and local job markets. Countries like the UK and Australia have tightened immigration rules citing economic preservation.
- Political concerns: Domestic political pressures and the rise of populist sentiments often push governments to restrict refugee entry to appease electorates or guard national sovereignty, as seen in Hungary's border policies.
- Legal concerns: States may argue that asylum seekers do not meet specific legal criteria. For instance, the EU's Dublin Regulation mandates that refugees seek asylum in their first country of arrival, leading to disproportionate pressure on border nations like Greece and Italy.
Conclusion
While domestic security and economic stability are legitimate concerns, turning away persecuted individuals directly contradicts the ethical pillars of human rights and justice. Democratic nations must collaborate with international bodies to formulate balanced policies that offer compassionate refuge while addressing domestic concerns and the root causes of displacement.
Previous Question“Integrity is a value that empowers the human being.” Justify with suitable illustration. (150 words, 10 Marks)
Next QuestionThe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has quickly spread to various countries. As of May 8th, 2020, in India 56342 positive cases of corona had been reported. India with a population of more than 1.35 billion had difficulty in controlling the transmission of coronavirus among its population. Multiple strategies became necessary to handle this outbreak. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of India raised awareness about this outbreak and to take all necessary actions to control the spread of COVID-19. Indian Government implemented a 55-day lockdown throughout the country to reduce the transmission of the virus. Schools and colleges had shifted to alternative modes of teaching-learning-evaluation and certification. Online mode became popular during these days. India was not prepared for a sudden onslaught of such a crisis due to limited infrastructure in terms of human resources, money and other facilities needed for taking care of this situation. This disease did not spare anybody irrespective of caste, creed, religion on one hand and ‘have and have not’ on the other. Deficiencies in hospital beds, oxygen cylinders, ambulances, hospital staff and crematorium were the most crucial aspects. You are a hospital administrator in a public hospital at the time when coronavirus had attacked a large number of people and patients were pouring into the hospital day in and day out.
A. What are your criteria and justification for putting your clinical and non-clinical staff to attend to the patients knowing fully well that it is a highly infectious disease and resources and infrastructure are limited?
B. If yours is a private hospital, whether your jurisdiction and decision would remain the same as that of a public hospital?
