Acme Ai
A
gs1
150 Words10 Marks

Q.Why do some of the most prosperous regions of India have an adverse sex ratio for women? Give your arguments.

UPSC Mains 2014Society

Syllabus Point

  • Role of Women and Women’s Organization, Population and Associated Issues

Approach

  1. Introduction (Definition) (30-40 words): Mention how some of India’s most prosperous regions have an adverse sex ratio despite economic growth.
  2. Body (Explanation) (80-90 words): Write about reasons for adverse sex ratio in prosperous regions.
  3. Conclusion (20 words): Summarize how economic prosperity has not necessarily translated into gender equality.

Introduction

Some of India’s most prosperous regions, such as Haryana, Punjab, and Gujarat, have adverse sex ratios, with fewer females per 1,000 males compared to the national average of 1,020 females per 1,000 males (Census 2021). This paradox reflects deep-rooted socio-cultural biases and the influence of economic prosperity on gender dynamics.

Body

Reasons for Adverse Sex Ratio in Prosperous Regions:

  • Preference for Male Heirs:
    • Prosperous regions often exhibit a strong preference for male children, as sons are seen as carriers of the family name and inheritors of wealth and property.
    • Example: In Haryana and Punjab, traditional norms emphasize male dominance in lineage and inheritance, contributing to a skewed sex ratio.
  • Access to Sex-Selective Technologies:
    • Wealthier regions have better access to ultrasound technologies, enabling prenatal sex determination despite its prohibition under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act.
    • Example: States like Punjab, with higher per capita incomes, report higher incidences of sex-selective abortions (NFHS-5, 2019–2021).
  • Burden of Dowry:
    • The dowry system is prevalent in many prosperous areas, and the associated financial burden often reinforces a preference for male children.
    • Example: In Punjab, dowry expectations remain significant despite economic progress, influencing decisions around family composition.
  • Patriarchal Norms:
    • Prosperity does not necessarily challenge patriarchal mindsets. Many affluent communities uphold traditional gender roles that devalue daughters, perpetuating adverse sex ratios.
    • Example: In Haryana, despite economic growth, cultural practices such as Khap Panchayat’s gender norms continue to favor male offspring.
  • Economic Security Through Sons:
    • Wealth often amplifies the desire to ensure the continuity of property and financial security through male heirs, sidelining daughters in inheritance matters.
    • Example: Wealthy landowning families in Gujarat and Punjab often prefer male children to manage assets and continue the family business.
  • Social Pressure and Status:
    • The preference for male children is linked to status and social prestige in affluent societies, where sons are perceived as symbols of power and continuity.
    • Example: In Rajasthan, sons are seen as essential for performing religious and cultural rites, particularly in wealthy communities.
  • Delayed Cultural Shifts:
    • Economic progress in these regions has not been accompanied by progressive gender attitudes. Cultural practices that favor boys persist despite advancements in wealth and infrastructure.
    • Example: The Global Gender Gap Report (2023) highlights India’s challenges in bridging gender equality in socio-cultural practices despite economic development.

Conclusion

The adverse sex ratio in India’s prosperous regions highlights the persistence of cultural and social biases against women, which economic growth alone cannot address. Combating this issue requires strict enforcement of laws, gender sensitization programs, and education campaigns that challenge patriarchal norms and promote the value of daughters, ensuring equitable development and gender equality.