Acme Ai
A
gs1
150 Words10 Marks

Q.Why was there a sudden spurt in famines in colonial India since the mid-eighteenth century? Give reasons. (Answer in 150 words) (2022)

UPSC Mains 2022History

Syllabus Point

  • Modern Indian History from about the middle of the eighteenth century until the present- significant events, personalities, issues.

Approach

  1. Introduction (30-40 words): Introduce the dramatic increase in frequency and severity of famines in India following the establishment of British colonial rule.

  2. Body (80-90 words): Detail the structural causes of these famines (commercialization of agriculture, exploitative land revenue, policy failures, grain exports, and deindustrialization).

  3. Conclusion (20 words): Summarize how colonial policy turned natural droughts into man-made humanitarian disasters.

Introduction

The mid-18th century marked a devastating shift in India's demographic history, characterized by a sudden surge in frequent and highly destructive famines (e.g., the Great Bengal Famine of 1770). While droughts triggered crop failures, the severity of these famines was fundamentally driven by exploitative colonial policies.

Body

graph TD
A["Famine Factors in Colonial India"] --> B["British Economic Policies: Commercialization of Agriculture, Land Revenue Exploitation"]
A --> C["Natural Factors & Population Growth: Droughts & Monsoon Failure, Population Rise"]
A --> D["Destruction of Traditional Agrarian System: Disruption of Village Economy, Decline of Irrigation"]
A --> E["Failure of British Famine Policies: Laissez-Faire Approach, Export of Grains"]
  • Forced Commercialization of Agriculture: The colonial administration pressured farmers to cultivate non-food cash crops (like indigo, cotton, and opium) instead of food grains, reducing domestic food reserves and increasing vulnerability to monsoonal failures.

  • Exploitative Land Revenue Systems: Rigid revenue demands under systems like the Permanent Settlement forced peasants into debt, leading to land alienation and leaving them with no surplus grain reserves.

  • Disruption of Traditional Relief Systems: The British dismantled traditional community-based grain storage and local charity networks, replacing them with a market-driven economy.

  • Adherence to Laissez-Faire and Grain Exports: Guided by free-market ideologies, the colonial government refused to ban grain exports even during severe shortages. For instance, districts in the Madras Presidency continued exporting grain during active famines.

  • Administrative Neglect and Apathy: Relief measures were often delayed, inadequate, or tied to harsh labor tests (e.g., the restrictive measures implemented under Lord Curzon).

  • Drain of Wealth and Deindustrialization: The destruction of domestic handicrafts impoverished millions, leaving them without the purchasing power to buy food during crop failures.

Conclusion

Colonial-era famines were not merely natural disasters; they were structural, man-made catastrophes engineered by exploitative economic policies and administrative neglect.