Q.Critically examine the Supreme Court’s judgement on ‘National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014’ with reference to appointment of judges of higher judiciary in India.
How to approach: Present balanced arguments: dedicate ~50% of the body to positive dimensions/rationale, ~35% to structural challenges/criticisms backed by data or committee reports, and close with a pragmatic reform roadmap.
Practice & AI Tools for This Question
Wrote an answer to this PYQ? Check it with Vision AI in 3 mins or generate custom mind maps.
Matched Topper Handwritten Answer Copies (8)
Open in 3D PYQ RealmIntroduction
The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act, 2014, introduced via the 99th Constitutional Amendment, aimed to reform the judicial appointment process in India. It proposed a six-member commission comprising the Chief Justice of India, senior Supreme Court judges, the Union Law Minister, and two eminent persons. This was designed to replace the opaque Collegium system with a more transparent, participatory mechanism involving both the judiciary and the executive.
Body
1. Summary of the Supreme Court's Judgment (2015)
- Unconstitutionality: In the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015) case, the Court declared the NJAC Act unconstitutional, ruling that it violated Articles 50 (separation of powers) and 124.
- Judicial Independence: The Court held that executive presence (the Law Minister and eminent persons) in the appointment process compromised judicial independence, which is a core component of the Constitution's Basic Structure (as established in the Kesavananda Bharati case).
- Reinstatement of the Collegium: The ruling reinstated the Collegium system, emphasizing that any alternative must fully safeguard judicial autonomy.
- Dissenting Voice: Justice Chelameswar dissented, arguing that the NJAC offered a balanced approach with broad democratic consensus and that executive involvement did not inherently threaten judicial independence.
2. Criticisms of the Judgment
- Judicial Supremacy: Critics argue the ruling reinforced an insular "judges appointing judges" system, lacking external oversight and public accountability.
- Overextension of Basic Structure: Some legal scholars view the decision as judicial overreach, excessively limiting Parliament's constituent power to reform the judiciary.
- Lack of Reform: While the Court acknowledged the Collegium's flaws, it failed to institute concrete reforms, leaving issues like the delayed Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) unresolved.
- Exclusion of Democratic Oversight: Excluding the legislature and executive undermines the democratic principle of checks and balances.
- Public Trust: The lack of transparency in the reinstated Collegium system risks eroding public confidence in the judiciary's legitimacy.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court's NJAC judgment successfully protected judicial independence but at the cost of preserving an opaque appointment process. As former CJI J.S. Verma noted, "Transparency is the hallmark of the judiciary." Future reforms must strike a delicate balance between preserving judicial autonomy and ensuring public accountability.
Question Specifications, Marking Rubric & Syllabus Mapping
| Examination & Year | UPSC Civil Services Mains Examination 2017 (Question 2) |
|---|---|
| Paper & Syllabus Topic | General Studies Paper II — Polity, Governance, Social Justice & IR → Indian Constitution & Polity |
| Marks, Word Limit & Ideal Time | 10 Marks • 150 Words • Ideal Writing Time: 7–8 Minutes |
| Directive Word & Core Demand | Critically Examine: Inspect the issue in detail while weighing both strengths/achievements and limitations/bottlenecks with factual evidence. |
| Recommended Structure Split | Intro: ~20–25 Words • Body: ~100 Words (3–4 dimensions) • Conclusion: ~20–25 Words |
| AI Practice & Evaluation Tools | Upload Handwritten Answer for 3-Min Vision AI Evaluation | Generate Custom Answer & Mind Map |
Related & Repeated UPSC Mains PYQs (4)
Past UPSC Mains questions connected to this node in the 3D PYQ Realm knowledge graph.
The Supreme Court of India keeps a check on arbitrary power of the Parliament in amending the Constitution. Discuss critically.
Whether the Supreme Court Judgment (July 2018) can settle the political tussle between the Lt. Governor and elected government of Delhi? Examine.
Discuss the desirability of greater representation to women in the higher judiciary to ensure diversity, equity and inclusiveness.
“Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy.” Comment.
More UPSC Mains PYQs on Polity & Constitution (GS2)
Build comprehensive topical mastery across Indian Constitution & Polity by practicing these related UPSC Mains questions.
Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees with particular reference to "one nation - one election" principle.
Explain and distinguish between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals. Whether they entertain civil as well as criminal cases?
“The growth of cabinet system has practically resulted in the marginalisation of the parliamentary supremacy.” Elucidate.
“The duty of the Comptroller and Auditor General is not merely to ensure the legality of expenditure but also its propriety.” Comment
Right to privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty and is inherently protected under Article 21 of the constitution. Explain. In this reference discuss the law relating to D.N.A. testing of child in the womb to establish its paternity.
What changes has the Union Government recently introduced in the domain of Centre-State relations? Suggest measures to be adopted to build the trust between the Centre and the States and for strengthening federalism.
Frequently Asked Questions — UPSC Mains 2017 GS2 (Polity & Constitution)
How should I structure the answer for this UPSC Mains 2017 GS Paper II question on Polity & Constitution?
This 2017 GS Paper II question carries 10 marks with a 150-word limit and uses the "Critically Examine" directive. Present balanced arguments: dedicate ~50% of the body to positive dimensions/rationale, ~35% to structural challenges/criticisms backed by data or committee reports, and close with a pragmatic reform roadmap. Follow the ideal word split (Intro: ~20–25 Words • Body: ~100 Words (3–4 dimensions) • Conclusion: ~20–25 Words) and aim to finish within 7–8 Minutes.
Which UPSC Mains syllabus topic does this 2017 question belong to?
This question is part of General Studies Paper II — Polity, Governance, Social Justice & IR under the syllabus module "Indian Constitution & Polity". You can explore all repeated questions from Polity & Constitution in Acme AI's 3D PYQ Realm or filter all Polity & Constitution PYQs on the Mains PYQ Directory.
How can I get my handwritten answer to this 2017 GS2 PYQ evaluated by AI?
Write your answer on standard UPSC margin sheets, scan it as a PDF or image, and click "Evaluate My Answer (AI)" on this page to open Acme AI's Vision Transformer evaluator (/upsc-answer-evaluation?subject=GS2). It evaluates your structure, directive alignment, diagrams/maps, and handwriting presentation in under 3 minutes with 99% human-examiner accuracy (20 free credits on signup).
Can I generate a custom mind map or Hindi model answer for this question?
Yes. Click "Generate Answer & Mind Map" on this page to open Acme AI's Answer Generator (/gen-ans) with this exact 2017 GS2 question pre-filled. You can generate custom topper-grade answers with embedded Mermaid flowcharts and mind maps in either English or Hindi.
AI-Powered Mains Mastery Suite
Turn Passive PYQ Reading into Active Answer Writing
Evaluate your handwritten UPSC Mains answers in 3 minutes with Vision AI or generate custom model answers with mind maps.
AI UPSC Mains Answer Evaluation
Practice writing any PYQ on paper and upload your handwritten scan (PDF or image) for instant, rubric-aligned UPSC examiner feedback.
- Direct Pixel Vision AI (Not Flat OCR): Evaluates your handwritten diagrams, maps, flowcharts, and spatial presentation
- 99% Human-Examiner Accuracy: Pinpoints missing dimensions, directive-word drift, and value-addition opportunities
- All Papers & 18 Optionals: Covers GS 1–4, Essay, Anthropology, PSIR, Sociology, Geography, History & more in English & Hindi
- Annotated Copy + Topper Benchmark: Visual margin ticks, remarks, and matched topper copy comparisons
AI UPSC Answer Generator & Mind Maps
Generate topper-grade model answers for any UPSC PYQ, current affairs editorial, or mock question—complete with visual mind maps and flowcharts.
- Embedded Mind Maps & Flowcharts: Automatically builds visual diagrams you can replicate in the exam hall for +1.5 extra marks
- Strict Directive & Word Discipline: Calibrated for 150-word (10M), 250-word (15M), and 1000-word Essay structures
- Committee, SC & Data Citations: Enriches body paragraphs with 2nd ARC, NITI Aayog, Constitutional Articles, and SDG hooks
- Auto-Matched Topper Copies & PYQs: Every generated answer links to similar past UPSC questions and ranker scripts
Join the Acme Mains Program (AMP 2027 — 45 Tests) or 1-on-1 Personal Mentorship with Avinash Sir.