Acme Ai
A
अ
gs2
150 Words10 Marks

Q.‘Simultaneous election to the Lok Sabha and the State Assemblies will limit the amount of time and money spent in electioneering but it will reduce the government’s accountability to the people’ Discuss.

UPSC Mains 2017•Polity

Model Answer

View this Question In PYQ Realm

Introduction

'Simultaneous Elections' refers to the synchronization of the electoral cycles of the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies. While this practice was the norm in India until 1969, subsequent political developments led to staggered cycles. Proponents argue it reduces election costs and administrative strain, while critics contend it dilutes federalism and reduces government accountability.

graph TD
    SE["Simultaneous Elections in India"]
    SE --> Pros["Pros"]
    SE --> Cons["Cons"]
    Pros --> REC["Reduced election costs"]
    Pros --> IVT["Increased voter turnout"]
    Pros --> SG["Streamlined governance"]
    Cons --> CAN["Constitutional amendments needed"]
    Cons --> VFS["Violation of federal spirit"]
    Cons --> PDI["Premature dissolution issues"]

Body

1. Arguments For Simultaneous Elections

  • Cost Efficiency: Separate elections incur massive recurring expenditures. The 2024 Lok Sabha election is estimated to cost around ₹1.35 lakh crore, with the cost of a single vote reaching ₹1,400. Synchronization would significantly consolidate these resources.
  • Administrative Efficiency: Staggered elections continuously strain security forces and administrative machinery. Simultaneous polls would minimize disruptions.
  • Developmental Impact: Frequent enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) halts developmental projects. Synchronization would prevent policy paralysis.
  • Combating Divisive Politics: It could shift the focus from localized, caste-based, or regional issues to broader national development narratives.
  • Reducing Voter Fatigue: Consolidating elections can improve voter turnout by reducing the frequency of voting cycles.

2. Arguments Against Simultaneous Elections

  • Federalism Concerns: Critics argue it centralizes political narratives, overshadowing regional issues with national agendas, which undermines the federal structure.
  • Reduced Accountability: Staggered elections force politicians to regularly face the electorate, ensuring continuous accountability. Fixed terms might breed complacency among elected representatives.
  • Cost-Saving Myth: The initial transition would require massive investments in EVMs and VVPATs, and by-elections would still be necessary.

3. Legal and Constitutional Challenges

  • Implementing this change requires amending multiple constitutional articles, including Articles 83(2), 85(2), 172(1), and 174(2), alongside potential ratification by at least half of the state legislatures under Article 368.
  • It also interacts complexly with the Anti-Defection Law (10th Schedule) and local body election frameworks across 28 states.

Conclusion

While simultaneous elections offer clear fiscal and administrative benefits, they pose risks to democratic accountability and federal diversity. A balanced approach, such as phased synchronization or partial alignment, may offer a more viable middle ground.

Previous QuestionCritically examine the Supreme Court’s judgement on ‘National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014’ with reference to appointment of judges of higher judiciary in India.
Next QuestionHunger and Poverty are the biggest challenges for good governance in India still today. Evaluate how far successive governments have progressed in dealing with these humongous problems. Suggest measures for improvement.