Acme Ai
A
gs3
150 Words10 Marks

Q.The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is viewed as a cardinal subset of China’s larger ‘One Belt One Road’ initiative. Give a brief description of CPEC and enumerate the reasons why India has distanced itself from the same.

UPSC Mains 2018International Relations

Introduction

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is the flagship project of China's ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), formerly known as the "One Belt One Road" (OBOR) initiative. Launched in 2013, CPEC is designed to boost connectivity between China and Pakistan through an extensive network of highways, railways, pipelines, and energy infrastructure, aimed at fostering regional trade and economic integration.


Body Analysis

Brief Description of CPEC

  • Strategic Route: CPEC spans a 3,000 km corridor connecting the deep-water Gwadar Port in Pakistan's Balochistan province to China's landlocked Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. This provides Beijing with a direct route to the Arabian Sea, bypassing the congested Strait of Malacca.
  • Economic Scope: The corridor involves massive investments exceeding $60 billion, covering infrastructure development, energy plants, special economic zones (SEZs), and the modernization of Gwadar Port.
  • Strategic Utility: For China, CPEC secures shorter energy supply routes and opens new markets. For Pakistan, it serves as a major driver for infrastructure modernization and economic growth.

Reasons Why India Has Distanced Itself from CPEC

graph TD
    CPEC["India's Strategic Reasons for Rejecting CPEC Involvement"] --> DTD["Debt Trap Diplomacy<br/>(India fears CPEC could lead to Chinese economic dominance)"]
    CPEC --> SC["Sovereignty Concerns<br/>(India's territorial integrity is challenged by CPEC's route through PoK)"]
    CPEC --> BRP["Bilateral Relations with Pakistan<br/>(Ongoing tensions over Kashmir affect India's view of CPEC)"]
    CPEC --> SSC["Strategic and Security Concerns<br/>(CPEC enhances Chinese influence, raising security alarms for India)"]
    CPEC --> EC["Economic Competition<br/>(CPEC could skew regional economics, disadvantaging India)"]
  • Sovereignty Violations: A major portion of CPEC passes through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), which India claims as an integral part of its territory. By constructing permanent infrastructure there, the project attempts to legitimize Pakistan's illegal occupation, directly violating India's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
  • Strategic Encirclement ("String of Pearls"): India views CPEC and the development of Gwadar Port as part of China's geopolitical strategy to encircle India with military and dual-use dual-port infrastructure across the Indian Ocean region.
  • Altering the Regional Balance of Power: By significantly upgrading Pakistan's economic and military infrastructure, CPEC could skew the regional balance of power in Pakistan's favor, particularly along disputed borders.
  • Bilateral Friction: Endorsing CPEC would amount to a tacit acceptance of Pakistan's claims over PoK, which is politically unacceptable for New Delhi.
  • Undermining Indian Connectivity Initiatives: CPEC competes with India's own regional connectivity projects, such as the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) and the development of Iran's Chabahar Port, by pulling regional partners into Beijing's orbit.
  • Debt-Trap Diplomacy: India is concerned that CPEC's unsustainable financing model could push Pakistan into a severe debt trap, eventually forcing it to cede strategic assets to China, further complicating regional security.

Conclusion

As India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar noted, "Connectivity is good for progress, but connectivity cannot violate sovereignty and territorial integrity." This position highlights India's principled stance against CPEC, reflecting its concerns over sovereignty and China's expanding footprint in South Asia.