Acme Ai
A
अ
gs2
250 Words15 Marks

Q.The Indian Constitution has provisions for holding a joint session of the two houses of the Parliament. Enumerate the occasions when this would normally happen and also the occasions when it cannot, with reasons thereof. (15 Marks, 250 Words)

UPSC Mains 2017•Polity

Model Answer

View this Question In PYQ Realm

Introduction

Under Article 108, the Indian Constitution provides a mechanism for holding a joint session of both Houses of Parliament. This provision is designed to facilitate the smooth conduct of legislative business by allowing the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha to sit together under specific circumstances to resolve deadlocks over non-money bills.

Body Analysis

Occasions When a Joint Session of Parliament is Held

1. Rejection of a Bill by the Other House

  • Condition: When a bill passed by one chamber (e.g., Lok Sabha) is transmitted to the other (e.g., Rajya Sabha) and is rejected by it.
  • Article: Article 108 states that if the Rajya Sabha rejects a bill passed by the Lok Sabha, and the Lok Sabha insists on its passage, a joint sitting can be summoned to resolve the impasse.
  • Purpose: This ensures that crucial legislative measures are not permanently stalled by the opposition of one house, thereby preventing legislative stalemates.

2. Disagreement on Amendments

  • Condition: When both houses disagree on the amendments proposed to a bill, leading to a deadlock where neither house accepts the other's version.
  • Article: Under Article 108, if the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha fail to reach an agreement on amendments, the President may summon a joint session.
  • Purpose: To provide a common platform for both houses to deliberate and reconcile their differences on the bill's final text.

3. Inaction or Delay Beyond Six Months

  • Condition: If a bill passed by one house remains pending in the other house for more than six months without being passed.
  • Article: Article 108 specifies that if the receiving house takes no action for six months, a joint session may be convened.
  • Purpose: To address unwarranted legislative delays and ensure bills do not remain in limbo indefinitely.

Exceptions: Occasions When a Joint Session Cannot Be Held

1. Money Bills

  • Article: Article 110 governs Money Bills.
  • Definition: These bills deal with taxation, public expenditure, and borrowing, requiring only the Lok Sabha's approval.
  • Process: Once passed by the Lok Sabha, the Rajya Sabha has a limited role and can only make recommendations within 14 days, which the Lok Sabha is not bound to accept.
  • Implication: Since the Rajya Sabha cannot reject or permanently stall a Money Bill, there is no possibility of a deadlock, making a joint session unnecessary.

2. Constitutional Amendment Bills

  • Article: Article 368 governs the amendment procedure.
  • Procedure: Amendments require separate approval by both houses with a special majority (two-thirds of members present and voting).
  • Disagreements: If there is a disagreement between the two houses, there is no provision for a joint session. The bill simply falls through.
  • Implication: This reflects the sanctity and complexity of constitutional amendments, requiring independent consensus from both chambers.

Historical Examples of Joint Sessions

  • Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961: Passed via a joint session due to disagreements between the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.
  • Banking Service Commission Repeal Act, 1977: Convened to resolve legislative differences between the two houses.
  • Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), 2002: Passed in a joint sitting after facing a deadlock in the Rajya Sabha.

Conclusion

The provision for joint sittings under Article 108 is a vital constitutional tool to resolve legislative deadlocks and ensure effective governance. While it facilitates consensus on ordinary bills, it strictly excludes Money Bills and Constitutional Amendment Bills due to their distinct constitutional procedures. As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar noted, the joint session serves as a mechanism to overcome legislative deadlocks, ensuring that the representatives of the people can pass critical laws smoothly.

Previous QuestionInitially Civil Services in India were designed to achieve the goals of neutrality and effectiveness, which seems to be lacking in the present context. Do you agree with the view that drastic reforms are required in Civil Services. Comment.
Next QuestionTo enhance the quality of democracy in India the Election Commission of India has proposed electoral reforms in 2016. What are the suggested reforms and how far are they significant to make democracy successful? (15 Marks, 250 Words)