gs4
150 Words10 Marks
Q.Increased national wealth did not result in equitable distribution of its benefits. It has created only some “enclaves of modernity and prosperity for a small minority at the cost of the majority.” Justify.
UPSC Mains 2017•Ethics & Integrity
Model Answer
View this Question In PYQ RealmSyllabus Point
- Corporate Governance
Approach
- Introduction (Definition) (30-40 words)
- Discuss how economic growth should ideally foster shared prosperity, yet in nations like India, wealth often benefits a privileged few, leaving the majority facing poverty, unemployment, and inadequate basic services.
- Body (Explanation) (80-90 words)
- Justify how economic growth has led to inequality.
- Discuss implications of unequal wealth distribution.
- Suggest way forward for inclusive economy.
- Conclusion (20 words)
- Emphasize on how economic growth without equity concentrates wealth among a few. True development requires inclusive growth, social welfare, and fair wealth distribution to benefit all.
Introduction
Despite significant economic growth and increased national wealth in many countries, this prosperity has often not been equitably distributed among the population. Instead, it has led to the creation of "enclaves of modernity and prosperity" that benefit a small minority while leaving the majority behind. This phenomenon can be observed globally, including in rapidly developing economies like India and China, as well as in advanced economies such as the United States.
graph TD; AccessToServices["Access to Services"] --> Balance["Balancing Economic Growth and Equity"]; UrbanDevelopmentFocus["Urban Development Focus"] --> Balance; ConcentrationOfWealth["Concentration of Wealth"] --> WealthyMinority["Wealthy Minority"]; LackOfServices["Lack of Services"] --> Balance; RuralUnderdevelopment["Rural Underdevelopment"] --> Balance; EconomicExclusion["Economic Exclusion"] --> DisadvantagedMajority["Disadvantaged Majority"]; Balance --> WealthyMinority; Balance --> DisadvantagedMajority;
Body
Concentration of Wealth:
- The benefits of economic growth have disproportionately accrued to the wealthiest individuals and corporations.
- Example: In India, the richest 1% of the population owns more than 50% of the country's wealth, while the bottom half of the population holds just a small fraction of the total wealth.
Urban-Rural Divide:
- Economic development has often been concentrated in urban areas, leading to significant disparities between urban and rural populations.
- Example: In China, while cities like Shanghai and Beijing have seen immense growth and modernization, many rural areas remain underdeveloped and impoverished.
Inequality in Access to Education and Healthcare:
- Increased national wealth has not translated into equal access to quality education and healthcare for all citizens.
- Example: In the United States, there are stark disparities in educational resources and healthcare facilities between affluent and low-income communities, exacerbating social inequalities.
Jobless Growth:
- Economic growth has often been accompanied by jobless growth, where the creation of wealth does not correspond with the creation of sufficient employment opportunities.
- Example: In India, while the IT sector has flourished, generating significant wealth, millions of people still struggle with unemployment or underemployment in other sectors.
Exclusion of Marginalized Communities:
- Economic benefits have largely excluded marginalized communities, perpetuating social and economic inequalities.
- Example: In South Africa, despite economic progress post-apartheid, racial and economic inequalities persist, with the majority black population still facing significant barriers to economic opportunities.
Housing and Infrastructure Disparities:
- The focus on urban development has often neglected the housing and infrastructure needs of the poor.
- Example: In Brazil, cities like São Paulo have modern skyscrapers and advanced infrastructure, but also vast favelas where millions live in substandard conditions without basic amenities.
Environmental Degradation:
- Economic development has often come at the cost of environmental degradation, disproportionately affecting poorer communities.
- Example: In Nigeria, the oil wealth has brought prosperity to a few but has also caused severe environmental damage in the Niger Delta, impacting the livelihoods of local communities.
Monopolistic Practices:
- The concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few large corporations has led to monopolistic practices, stifling competition and innovation.
- Example: In the tech industry, companies like Amazon and Google dominate the market, making it difficult for smaller companies to compete and succeed.
Corruption and Mismanagement:
- Corruption and mismanagement of resources have further exacerbated inequalities.
- Example: In many African countries, despite abundant natural resources, corruption has prevented wealth from benefiting the broader population, leading to widespread poverty.
Global Examples of Inequality:
- The issue of unequal distribution of wealth is not limited to developing countries but is also evident in advanced economies.
- Example: In the United States, the wealth gap between the rich and the poor has widened significantly over the past few decades, with the top 10% controlling the majority of the wealth.
Conclusion
Drawing on John Rawls' Theory of Justice, which emphasizes fairness and equity, it is imperative that governments and policymakers strive to create a more just and equitable society where the gains from development benefit all citizens, not just a privileged few.
Previous QuestionHow do subsidies affect the cropping pattern, crop diversity and economy of farmers? What is the significance of crop insurance, minimum support price and food processing for small and marginal farmers?
Next QuestionYou are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following:
A. There is a general perception that adhering to ethical conduct one may face difficulties to oneself and cause problems for the family, whereas unfair practices may help to reach the career goals.
B. When the number of people adopting unfair means is large, a small minority having a penchant towards ethical means makes no difference.
C. Sticking to ethical means is detrimental to the larger developmental goals
D. While one may not involve oneself in large unethical practices, but giving and accepting small gifts makes the system more efficient.
Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits.
