gs4
250 Words20 Marks
Q.You are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following: A. There is a general perception that adhering to ethical conduct one may face difficulties to oneself and cause problems for the family, whereas unfair practices may help to reach the career goals. B. When the number of people adopting unfair means is large, a small minority having a penchant towards ethical means makes no difference. C. Sticking to ethical means is detrimental to the larger developmental goals D. While one may not involve oneself in large unethical practices, but giving and accepting small gifts makes the system more efficient. Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits.
UPSC Mains 2017•Ethics & Integrity
Model Answer
View this Question In PYQ RealmIntroduction
Public administration is frequently challenged by pragmatic pressures that test ethical boundaries. To evaluate these four common perceptions, we must examine their consequences on public welfare, institutional trust, and long-term societal well-being.
Body Analysis
Examination of the Statements
A. Adhering to ethical conduct causes personal/familial difficulties, while unfair practices aid career advancement.
- Merits (Short-term individual utility): Unethical shortcuts can yield immediate personal benefits, such as accelerated promotions, financial security, or avoidance of hostile transfers, temporarily shielding one's family from hardship.
- Demerits (Long-term collective harm): This approach severely damages public trust and institutional integrity. Personally, it leads to cognitive dissonance, loss of self-respect, and the constant threat of legal prosecution, which ultimately inflicts far greater long-term harm on both the individual and their family.
B. When unfair means are widespread, an ethical minority makes no difference.
- Merits (Pragmatic observation): In highly corrupt environments, isolated ethical actions can feel insignificant, occasionally leading to professional isolation or systemic bypass.
- Demerits (Systemic impact): This view ignores the compounding positive utility of role models. Ethical civil servants preserve essential baseline standards of integrity, prevent complete institutional collapse, and inspire future administrators, proving that individual integrity is a prerequisite for systemic reform.
C. Sticking to ethical means is detrimental to larger developmental goals.
- Merits (Apparent operational speed): Bypassing complex regulations or environmental clearances can accelerate project execution, delivering immediate infrastructure or economic outputs.
- Demerits (Compromised sustainability): Development achieved through unethical means is inherently unstable and unequal. Circumventing safety or environmental laws leads to long-term disasters, resource depletion, and public alienation, resulting in a net negative utility for society.
D. Giving and accepting small gifts makes the system more efficient.
- Merits (Friction reduction): Small tokens can align with cultural customs of hospitality, potentially easing communication and creating a more cordial working relationship between citizens and officials.
- Demerits (Normalization of corruption): Accepting minor favors erodes professional objectivity and initiates a slippery slope toward systemic bribery. This practice undermines fair competition, compromises decision-making, and ultimately reduces administrative efficiency by institutionalizing rent-seeking behavior.
Conclusion
While unethical practices may offer transient, localized benefits, they generate substantial negative consequences for society over time. Adhering to strict ethical standards is indispensable for securing public trust, ensuring sustainable development, and maximizing collective welfare.
Previous QuestionIncreased national wealth did not result in equitable distribution of its benefits. It has created only some “enclaves of modernity and prosperity for a small minority at the cost of the majority.” Justify.
Next QuestionConflict of interest in the public sector arises when (a) official duties, (b) public interest, and (c) personal interest are taking priority one above the other. How can this conflict in administration be resolved? Describe with an example.
