gs2
150 Words10 Marks
Q.What introduces friction into the ties between India and the United States is that Washington is still unable to find for India a position in its global strategy, which would satisfy India’s National self-esteem and ambitions” Explain with suitable examples.
UPSC Mains 2019•International Relations
Model Answer
View this Question In PYQ RealmIntroduction
The bilateral partnership between India and the United States has deepened across successive US administrations. However, structural differences regarding trade, strategic autonomy, and regional priorities continue to introduce friction, as Washington struggles to accommodate India's unique national self-esteem and global ambitions within its global strategy.
Body
Historical Context of Tension
- Cold War Divergence: During the Cold War, India's policy of non-alignment and its nuclear ambitions clashed with US strategic interests, particularly during Indo-Pakistani conflicts.
- Sanctions and Isolation: The US imposed sanctions and diplomatic isolation on India following its nuclear tests in 1974 and 1998.
India's National Self-Esteem and Ambitions
- Aspirations for Global Leadership: India's claim for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council has met with rhetorical support but reluctant concrete action from the US.
- Rejection of Junior Partner Status: Despite growing ties, India refuses to be treated as a junior partner or to have its strategic decisions dictated by Washington.
- Strategic Autonomy: India's insistence on maintaining independent relations with countries like Russia and Iran often conflicts with US global strategies.
Frictions in the Strategic Partnership
- Defense and Security Interoperability: While India participates in the QUAD, it remains hesitant to transform it into a formal military alliance, fearing it would permanently alienate China and Pakistan.
- The S-400 and CAATSA: India's purchase of the Russian S-400 air defence system led to threats of US sanctions under CAATSA, which India views as an infringement on its sovereign defence decisions.
- Intellectual Property and Trade: Major trade frictions exist over patents, market access, and drug pricing. The US has previously terminated India's preferential trade status under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) and imposed tariffs on Indian steel and aluminum.
Examples of Divergence in Global Strategies
- Iran Sanctions: India's energy ties with Iran, despite unilateral US sanctions, highlight India's prioritization of its energy security over US geopolitical maneuvers.
- Russia-India Relations: India's sustained defence and economic relationship with Russia, especially in the wake of the Ukraine conflict, directly challenges the US strategy of isolating Moscow.
Way Forward
- The US should treat India as an equal partner, strengthening India's capabilities without expecting direct quid pro quos.
- Bolstering Indian power serves long-term US interests by preventing a Chinese-dominated hegemony in Asia.
- India must articulate a geopolitical vision that demonstrates strategic solidarity with the US while preserving its core autonomy.
Conclusion
A long-term US commitment to India in the Indo-Pacific is essential to translate the potential of this strategic relationship into concrete outcomes, recognizing India as an independent global power rather than a regional proxy.
