Official Answer Key & Detailed Solution
Ready to check the official UPSC Answer Key?
Click any option above to test yourself under exam conditions, or reveal the explanation directly.
Correct Answer: Option (D) — None
Concept & Option Breakdown
Standard Reference VerifiedStatement 1 is incorrect: Under Article 71(2), if the election of a person as President is declared void by the Supreme Court, acts done by that person in the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of the office before the date of the decision are not invalidated.
Statement 2 is incorrect: Article 62(1) mandates that an election to fill a vacancy caused by the expiration of the term of office of the President must be completed before the expiration of the term. Under Article 71(4), the election cannot be called in question on the ground of the existence of any vacancy among the members of the Electoral College (even if an assembly is dissolved).
Statement 3 is incorrect: Article 111 of the Constitution does not prescribe any specific time limit within which the President must give or declare assent to a bill, giving rise to the 'pocket veto'.
Constitutional common-sense check: Retrospective invalidation of official presidential acts would cause an administrative breakdown. A dissolved state assembly cannot hold the nation's head-of-state election hostage. 'Pocket veto' exists precisely because there is no time limit.
Practice Full-Length & Sectional Prelims Mocks on this Interface
50 simulated tests in the APT Prelims Test Series (₹1,493) or 1-on-1 Mentorship with Avinash Sir.